Reversible Computing with Gaussian Three-Phase Clocks and Copper-Torus Resonators
Bibliographic identity from the original PDF
Source title: Reversible Computing with Gaussian Three-Phase Clocks, Copper-Torus Resonators, and Passive Signed Networks: A Cumulative Mathematical and Circuit Verification
Printed author name: Mr.K · Archive author: Han Jae Jun
Year: 2026 · Working manuscript, not a claim of peer-reviewed acceptance.
Only a source excerpt or no stand-alone Abstract is available; no missing text is invented.
Source abstract and PDF provenance
Original abstract excerpt
This cumulative study develops a specified, normally conducting reversible-computing circuit model that couples four concrete mathematical and electrical structures: Gaussian- smoothed clocks, three T 3-indexed phases, copper toroidal RLC resonators, and a passive six-terminal signed crossover inspired by Möbius routing. The construction supplies exact Kirchhoff and reversible Boolean identities, finite-Fourier control and dissipation bounds, and reproducible circuit-model tests. A zero common-return current is not equated with zero copper heat or lossless practical operation. The R25–R26 results construct ideal differential output rails and certify finite-mode voltage margins over explicitly bounded passive-component variations; R27–R30 quantify driver- current, parasitic routing, copper skin-loss, energy-exchange and error-correction obligations. R31 proves a strict reverse-power lower bound for all three-source delay schedules in the specified two-harmonic coefficient family, and R44 shows by exact rational Fourier arithmetic that seven equally spaced ECC triplets (21 model ports) produce positive aggregate signed bus power at every time. The latter result does not eliminate reverse power or energy-transfer losses at individual output terminals. R45 strengthens the R44 result from identical source powers and common triplet offsets to independent bounded Fourier-coefficient and timing errors at all 21 ports. With a 0.1-µW coefficient envelope through harmonic 50 and independent 2-ps port timing deviation, the model’s bus-power lower bound is 1.789093 mW. An additional 50-µW per-port supremum allowance for the unmodeled high-harmonic signed-power tail leaves a strict 0.739093-mW lower bound. Parseval and Cauchy–Schwarz give a separate certified upper bound on local … [excerpt; full PDF linked below]
Original ZIP PDF: 261 pages · 9207303 bytes Original SHA-256: 29bc288cc23c3e45ca0fdcb61b625dc134f5761052cf6bce8b2809bf813bab72 Current Drive copy: 9207303 bytes Drive SHA-256: 29bc288cc23c3e45ca0fdcb61b625dc134f5761052cf6bce8b2809bf813bab72